|
Schooling or Learning?
When I was
going to school I often asked myself; what is it all for? Now
that I am 62 years old I ask myself again; what was it all for?
It is not an easy question to answer, for most of what I had so
called 'learned', I had no use for in my life, and have
forgotten. At school I was one of the students who enjoyed learning
school work. So now I can not help but wonder, if I who enjoyed school
work, have lost and not retained so much, what of the experience of
those who disliked school work? I seem to remember they were the vast
majority, and us nerds were the minority. The answers I believe are
determined by the answer to a single question. Did
they retain it and was it useful and influential in their lives?
For most of them, the answer is most assuredly no. So again
what was it all for?
Was it all
for Nothing?
I think much of it was for nothing. Of the things I learned at
school that I think have been of importance to me, I believe I
might have learned them better elsewhere. It seems that school
was an elaborate baby sitting system with pretensions to useful
instruction. What about the three Rs? When faced with this kind
of criticism of schools, many will bring up reading, writing
and arithmetic to justify schools. Maybe many students learned
these at school but I did not. I learned to read before I went
to school and improved my reading by much reading outside school.
I could print also before I went to school. I did learn to write
at school, if by write we mean the cursive script that enables
letters to be joined together in a continuous flow. But considering
the few letters I have written, that were not created on a computer,
this seems pretty much a waste of time also. (No I did not learn
computer at school.) Simple arithmetic, I had also mastered before
I went to school although it was much elaborated at school.
I believe however
that I might have learnt mathematics better elsewhere. I remember,
I had been top of my class in mathematics for many years, right
up to third or forth form in high school. In that year we got
a maths teacher, who was a real bitch, and who continually humiliated
me throughout the year. In that year I almost failed maths. I
remember going through my paper and finding a problem she had
failed to give me marks for. Marks that took me from failing
to passing. When I showed her this, she stood me up in front of the
class and ridiculed me and how untidy the paper was. After
this experience I never again delighted in learning pure maths.
Further this loss of interest actually prevented me getting into
computers when I first tried to find employment. This instance
I think shows how pivotal and destructive a teacher's influence can be.
What was
the use of schools? When I discovered that my parents were not going
to send me to university, I was not unduly disappointed, for
I was already learning psychology out of books and had studied
books on learning outside school. I saw no reason, why I could
not just continue to learn by myself, and I did. But life interferes.
What with work time and play time, I had little time to devote
to learning. Still I continued to read and jot down thoughts
and mark passages in books, thinking that I would some day do
something with it. Now, of course, I am trying to see if I have
indeed learned something. But I feel that I have been at a terrible
disadvantage, in that, I have had hardly anyone to discuss my ideas
with. I have tried to criticize my own ideas, but surely many
others would be better critics of such ideas. I have come
to the conclusion, that the true use of schools, is the community
of scholars who can discuss, criticize, formalize and make known
one's work.
John R. Platt
(one of the great school reformers) made this abundantly clear, but
I did not see it back when I started this. He said:
"The only thing that saves us is the fact that the
good students learn many things outside the curriculum. I think
that in many cases the reputations of the hard-driving schools,
both the high schools and the collages, is not due to the courses
or the staff at all, but is due to the quality of students they
are able to get. If you have hot-shots, it makes little difference
what you teach them - or whether you teach them at all; they
will find out from each other (as the whole human race did!)
how to be great contributors to society. The importance of this
initial student selection factor has never been sorted out in
assessing our schools. Many a school has good graduates not because
its education is good but because its students were good when
they came in and have not been much damaged."
Life at School.
Low Points. I do not want you
to think, that I was bitter about school, or that I disliked
it. On the contrary, I enjoyed school and was very successful
in school. I did think some things at school were a drag, like
having to play sport. I remember, some of us would perform some
minor offence, so we would be put in detention during sport.
Detention was actually enjoyable. Most of the time you could
do your homework, or read a book, as long as it was one they
approved of. Another thing I disliked actually happened because
of my behavior. For a long time, I was able to go into the school
library and read during my lunch hour. After a few years of this,
they noticed me and made a rule that students could only go into
the library for a short time during lunch, a quarter of
an hour before lunch finished. I remember, I would stand in front
of the principals office, where there was a clock, and wait to
go to the library. This also got me into trouble, when it was
noticed what I was doing. Now you may think these rules (as I
did) made no sense, but in fact the aims of the school in doing
this were admirable. They wanted us to socialize and engage in
physical activity. But of course, students like myself, needed
to be wooed to such things, and could not be forced.
High Points. For the most part
school was enjoyable.
Music. One of the
most enjoyable classes at school was our music class, which looking
back on it, was unusual in that it did many things. We could
learn to play an instrument and we learnt about how instruments
worked. We learnt about the great composers and how they lived
their lives. We learnt musical theory and we learnt to sing.
Most important we were exposed to many different types of music,
not just rock or pop. Also once a year the school would put on
a musical play (usually Gilbert and Sutherland) so students and teachers would take part. Preparation
and rehearsal for this was all part of our music class.
Maths. Looking back now I see that the school I went to was quite
good and even innovative. I remember one year they abandoned
streaming and put the good learners and bad learners together.
The idea being if you put good learning and bad learning together
some of the good learning might rub off. Sounds alright but of
course we did not talk in class and outside we did not mix. One
teacher, a maths teacher, must have decided to try to take this
a little further and he proposed an experiment. Because of the
previous streaming, he knew who were the good maths students
and who were poor ones. We also had desks that seated
two students. So he proposed that one of the poor students would sit
with one the better students. Furthermore both students were allowed to discuss problems as long
as they did it quietly.
In those days I was considered one of the better students in maths,
so I was paired with a kid who was having difficulties keeping up or
understanding anything at all. I do not know how the
experiment worked as a whole, but surprisingly this incident proved most gratifying
for me. It was rewarding helping this kid who was used to failing but
now had a chance. Ultimately he attained one of the better
passes in the class. My own learning and understanding of maths
also increased to a marked degree toward top marks probably because I
had to teach and so internalize the concepts. It may partly have been the
kid I was put next to, for he was clearly interested and wanted
to learn. I may not have talked to him, if he had not asked me
questions or if there were personality conflicts. I subsequently learnt that he went on to become
an engineer.
Counting Squares. My favorite time of the year was after the exams were over.
We still had to go to class, but sometimes the teachers let us
chose our own work, or they would provide glimpses
of the more advanced learning which we would not normally encounter
for some time, or they would give us puzzles to solve. This
worked as an incentive because I remember
one year a teacher gave us this particular puzzle to solve. It was a
way of demonstrating a mathematical idea, far in advance of our
current work. This puzzle consisted of a ten by ten square grid. We
had to find out how many squares could be traced following the lines that were there.
All the other kids rushed in and started counting squares, but I
could assess that the puzzle had real mathematical scope. I pondered
the question appearing to do nothing. This took a long while.
Obviously if one side was ten squares
and the other side was ten squares the total number of small
squares was 10 x 10 = 100, 100 squares. This helped but was far short
of the total answer. The whole
big grid was one square for a start. Consider the next smallest square
it was possible to draw. This was nine squares across and nine
squares down. One, two, three, four were traced. The pattern was
dawning on me. So then I drew the next smallest size of square 8
across and 8 down. There were 9. Was there an underlying relation?
Yes. It was 1 x 1 + 2 x 2 + 3 x 3 a simple relationship of squares.
Realizing all I had
to do was fill in the numbers up to ten, I started to multiply
each number by itself. To finalize the answers only had to be placed one beneath the
other ready to add up.
At this point the teacher stopped us and asked if any one
could give the answer. Many students gave answers but they were
clearly wrong. Their answers were far too small. I could see that even though
I did not have an answer. When no more hands popped up with answers
the teacher asked again if anyone had an answer. The boy sitting
next to me put his hand up. But when asked, he said John has the
answer. He been watching what I was doing. The teacher asked
if I had an answer. I replied that I thought that I had worked
out how to solve the problem, but that I had not completed calculating
the answer. The teacher then asked me to come out to the black
board and show the class. I went out to the black board and wrote
down the numbers 1+4+9+16+25+36+49+64+81+100=385.

The solving of a problem that nobody else can, can produce great
elation. This nurtured a sudden love for mathematics in me. It
was like an oceanic wave
sweeping over me. Thus a clarity about maths seemed to fill every space
in my mind. My entire life experience was clarified and reinterpreted. I felt as one with the universe. This I believe was my first (what
Maslow calls) a peak experience.
Physics & Algebra. I was to have another very similar
peak experience before I left school. It was much later when I was
in forth or fifth form. Our text book for physics was mostly
experiments to be done in class, but in the back were a number of
related problems to be solved. Students were supposed to gradually
work their way through
the problems, and I did. Once you understood the physics involved
the problems were easy to do, or so I thought, till I got to one
particular question. I puzzled over it for many days, till finally,
I put up my hand in class and asked the teacher how to do it. The
teacher came over and sat down with me and looked at the problem. He
tried for a long while but he finally had to admit he did not know
how to solve the problem. He said he would ask the other teachers
who had used this book before. But it turned out that nobody knew
how to solve it. Although the teacher said not to worry,
it occurred to me that someone who had written the book had thrown
down a clever challenge. Our teachers advice was to skipp this
particular question, completely forget about it and get on with the rest of the problems.
As far as I was concerned this was like a red rag to a bull.
Now I just had to solve this problem. More days went by and I
began to spend all my spare time trying to solve the problem.
That year or just previously we had been introduced to a new
subject called algebra which had seemed to have no practical
use and was thoroughly boring. So while in an algebra class I
was mulling over this physics problem in my mind. Because I was
in the algebra class I suppose it occurred to me that maybe I
could see what was happening in the problem better if I substituted
x and y for the variables in the problem. I had a physics class
that day and I could hardly wait to try out my new idea. When
I got to the physics class I paid no attention to the teacher.
Instead I was totally obsessed by the problem. I made the substitution.
It still did not make a lot of sense but I could feel I was on
the right track. I simplified the whole problem to numbers and
letters and wrote it out as an equation, and there it was, a simple
algebraic transformation suddenly made the problem solvable.
I could feel the wave of euphoria coming even as I put my hand up,
telling the teacher I had solved the problem. Soon I was out at the
black board explaining to the rest of the class. I had solved it,
while other students had not been able to.
The teachers had been stumped, but I had done it. Not
only that, but the patterns in my mind began to flow and change and
crystallize into something vast and new. Algebra was not only useful but it might
be used to unlock the most complex of problems. Not only that
but all the strange things the teachers were teaching us might
be able to do such profound things. What a rush. It's like one
moment you were almost dead and the next you are totally alive.
As if you have unlocked the secrets of the universe. Not everyone
experiences these euphoric moments, but those who do I believe have an
advantage in that they are much more likely to come to love learning.
More Physics & Algebra. One last high point is worth a
mention. After my great success combining physics with algebra, I
was always on the lookout for another chance to do it again. This
chance came quite some time after but while I was in the same form. The teacher
was in the process of solving a problem on the board dealing
with mass and acceleration. Suddenly I saw that there was an
easier way to do it, because if you used an algebraic transformation
a considerable amount of the problem cancelled itself out. I
put up my hand and explained that I thought I had an easier way
to solve the problem. The teacher invited me out to the board
to explain which I did. I did the transformation and then solved
the problem easily. The teacher thanked me and I returned to
my seat. But this time there was no peak experience. Sure I felt
good and well pleased with myself but no massive change in my
mind and no feeling of being one with the universe.
In hindsight my peak experiences and triumphs were rather trivial
and narcissistic but where this can be fostered in children it
surely is a shortcut to learning and self esteem. Although Maslow
did not mention anything about people having peak experiences at
school it, seems an ideal time to foster such things if at all
possible. Surely this kind of experience, which is always some kind
of learning experience, should be one of the great positive benefits
of all learning.
The Turning
Point.
Another math class provided a very different experience. Some
weeks previously our class was doing some work on the relation
between arcs and segments of spheres. I suddenly realized it
would be possible to calculate the surface area of the earth.
I already understood the exercises we were supposed to be doing
at that time, so I decided to work out the surface area of the
world. As I was working the teacher came up behind me looked
over my shoulder and realized I was not doing the current exercises
he had set. He asked me what I was doing, and I started to explain
the problem I was working on. He told me I was not there to learn
such things, and that I was there only to learn the exercises
he had set. Even though I pointed out that what I was doing was maths,
he insisted that I was there to do only what he told me to do. It went
very quiet in the room. Everybody was looking at me and the teacher. I
closed what I was doing conceding to start one of the problems on the
board. The atmosphere in the room was strange but I knew I had won a moral victory.
More than that, it was as if the teacher had striped his mask
away. We had all seen for a moment the naked truth about schools. The
teacher never came near me again, nor did he mention this incident
again. Indeed he acted very sheepish after this, not even looking in my
direction for many days. He knew he had said the wrong thing. He had
unintentionally cut through all the high sounding waffle and had exposed the reality of what
he and I were there for. He felt he needed to show he was in control
rather than allowing learning to take place. This might not seem like a
high point, but it felt good, and as you might imagine, it changed my
life. Never again would I see teachers as the high priests of knowledge.
Now I perceived knowledge to be for
the taking. I would get it by hook or by crook when those in authority were
not looking.
Life after School.
Work. Even though I had done
fairly well at school and matriculated, my parents did not expect me to
go to university. It was decided that I would leave high school and get
a job. Being interested in science and art, I applied for a job at Kodak
working in computers. We were given a special type of intelligence test
to see if we were suitable. The test consisted of two parts one
concerned with mathematics, and the other with matching symbols. I did
not get the job because I failed the maths section. But evidently they
were impressed with my symbol matching, so they gave me a job as a trainee
manager in the emulsion section.
Learning
and psychology. About this time I became increasingly immersed in reading
books on psychology and books on education, subjects that I had aroused
my interest at school. All this combined to open up for me a lifelong
interest in learning. Of particular interest were the books on psychology as
well those on learning because at that time there was a great deal of
popular literature coming out on both these subjects. I remember, I used
to go to a counterculture bookshop that was just stacked with rows and
rows of such books. Among the authors were Jonathan Kozol, Herbert Kohl, George Dennison, Ivan Illich, James
Herndon, Jean Piaget, William Glasser, Carl Rogers, Thomas Gordon, and
especially John Holt and Abraham Maslow who really impressed me. As I
sifted through this material I began to write down my own thoughts about
such. I began to fill huge notepads full of notes.
A depressing discovery. After I
had be doing this for several years, the day came when I was talking about these
ideas to my step
cousin's wife, who was a teacher, and she suggested I
should go with her one day to her school. She said she believed her
school was quite progressive. The only thing, that I can still recall clearly
about that day, was being in the teacher's lounge and listening to a
teacher endlessly criticize the more progressive methods used there.
What was worse, was that none of the other teachers were arguing back.
Not even I argued back. Later I asked Carol (the girl who had taken me
there) why that guy was working at the school if he disliked it so much.
She explained that he and the school had no choice and that teachers
were allocated to the school by the board of education (if I remember
correctly). Anyway, although I continued to write notes for several years
after that, I think the visit to the school had made me lose heart that
anything could ever be done.
Life. Gradually work and life
made more and more demands on me and I did less and less reading and
writing. The big break came when I decided to leave Australia and go and
live in Thailand. Curiously in Thailand I eventually ended up teaching.
I must admit I was not very good at teaching, but the experience was
useful in enabling me to see first hand, the problems teachers are faced
with. For a long while nothing further happened. My notes
and books were back in Australia and my life in Thailand was very full
and did not include much to do with learning or psychology. It has only
been the result of illness and inactivity that I started again to
compile learning information.
New books. Realizing my
knowledge was antiquated, I began to buy new books. I scoured bookshops,
bought a few related books but the subject that interested me seemed to
be out of vogue in this age. I started to do searches on Amazon but the books I was
finding seemed only peripherally concerned with learning methodology. Twenty
something years had intervened and there was a hole in my knowledge. I
needed to look elsewhere than the popular books. The only thing I could
verify was that nothing much seemed to have happened to change schools
from what I had known. One noticeable thing was that
corporal punishment seemed to have mostly disappeared.
Alfie Kohn. One day, almost by
accident, I picked up a book in a bookshop a book called
"Punished by Rewards".
This not only was in keeping with my previous
knowledge on learning but expanded it considerably. Mr. Alfie Kohn it
seemed had been carrying on a battle almost single handedly to
popularize a huge change in how social psychologists were currently
looking at motivation and lo and behold it had seemed to come down on
the side of intrinsic motivation. Not only that, but Mr. Kohn had
carefully documented all his references. A world of new knowledge opened
up to me to stimulate me towards this website.
|